"My dream can and will come true if we look into the future and see the light that shines there."
Earlier today, a court in Haifa found that the IDF were not responsible for the death of US peace and justice activist, Rachel Corrie.
The judge in the case, Oded Gershon, stated in his summing up "The deceased put herself into a dangerous
situation, she stood in front of a giant bulldozer in a place where the
operator could not see her. She did not distance herself as a reasonable person
would have done." He went on to say, "Her death is the result
of an accident she bought upon herself." The finding has been greeted with dismay by
her parents and outrage by human rights organisations and activists around the
world.
On the 16th March 2003, 23-year-old
Rachel’s life was ended when she was run over by a D9R armoured Caterpillar bulldozer
being employed by the IDF to demolish Palestinian homes in the Rafah district
of Gaza. Since 1967 an estimated 27,000 Palestinian homes and structures have been demolished by Israel.
Corrie’s family subsequently accused Israel
of intentionally and unlawfully killing Rachel and have spent almost a decade
seeking justice for their daughter, pursuing a civil case after an Israeli
military investigation acquitted their forces of any wrongdoing.
Despite eyewitness reports stating that
Rachel was deliberately run over and documentary evidence to show that she was wearing
a high-visibility jacket, speaking through a loud-haler and standing on a mound
of rubble, the Israeli army have continued to maintain it was an accident.
In a press release today, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights who investigated
Rachel’s death at the time, claim that the bulldozer deliberately ran over
Rachel. They go on to say: “Israel’s
house demolitions are a violation of Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention,
which prohibits the targeting of civilian property. Rachel Corrie was
within her rights protesting this illegal activity and should not have been
attacked. As per Article 10 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel, as the
Occupying Power, is obligated to facilitate humanitarian workers in the
Occupied Territory. As outlined in the Fourth Geneva Convention Commentary on
Article 10, this obligation is extended to any impartial humanitarian
organization that performs activities, including but not limited to,
“representations, interventions, suggestions and practical measures affecting
the protection under the Convention.” Rachel Corrie’s intervention at the
house demolition falls under an approved humanitarian activity.
Therefore, in addition to the fact that she was a civilian, a prohibited target
under Article 54 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the killing of Rachel Corrie
violated Israel’s obligation as an Occupying Power to facilitate humanitarian
work.
Regardless of the court’s findings, Rachel
will be remembered by the world as a courageous young woman who stood against injustice. A woman who
stood for humanity.

No comments:
Post a Comment
You are welcome to leave respectful comments on my blog- this doesn't mean you have to agree with me, just that you are not offensive. Due to the nature of what I am writing about I will be moderating all comments so apologies if it takes a while before your comment gets posted.